A common source of energy produces all of life, though no one knows what it is. What can be recognized is that while the energy remains consistent in its production of physicality’s, (elements, atoms, and different animal species are created in a constant pattern), its work is less predictable in the one known area of intangible creativity – human thought.
This same common source of energy produces all human thought. It enters each person through a genetically designed transformer in their brain, provides them with their individual conception of life, of reality, of what is going on, and becomes the private running commentary that they will hear in their head for the rest of their life. Contrasted to all electrons, zebras and homo-sapiens appearing physically similar, in the realm of thought there is no such consistency.
Whatever be the common source of thought, each person has but an individually transformed piece thereof, thus what any ordinary man “knows” about life must be put in quotation marks and considered extremely conditional. If this were not so, all men would be in agreement as to what life is about, and there would be no conflicting religions, philosophers or personal views. But if there is some basic Fact which explains everything, then no ordinary man’s mind has the full comprehension of what it is…but, all men have been given an individually translated bit of it.
Not recognizing this, each man believes that the running commentary he hears about life in his brain is a valid analysis of what is actually going on. While it cannot be said to be, nor can it be without any connection to the reality it comments on, neither can a super alert and curious man rely thereon for the exceptional info he seeks. If that neural commentary cum analysis normally provided to man contained such, all of man’s questions would have long ago been satisfied.
There is a parallel, alternative commentary floating around out there which provides an entirely different analysis of what is going on, but one which few men are wired to receive. It does not contradict the common one, but rather, expands it. It sees the same events as the ordinary commentary, but its analyses are far different as between looking through a peep hole and a telescope, or measuring by a tape measure and topology. (Although no comparison can actually cover it, if such was possible, the noted distinction would not exist and everyone would be tuned into the latter commentary.)
J.