Goods and Services
Video does NOT contain the first 5 minutes of aphorisms that is on the audio below.
February 1, 1989
AKS/News Item Gallery = jcap 1989-01-30 (0452)
Condensed AKS/News Items = See Below
Summary = See Below
Diagrams = See Below
Transcript = kneededit before posting
Curation = 4D Science
0452 video grab
Summary
Jan Cox Talk 0452 – Feb 1, 1989 * 1:39
Notes by TK
Kyroot to :04
The absentee owner of the universe hires 3 landlords to arrange judgment day for the human race; they must decide the basis for judging each man according to 1) what/how a man has thought; 2) what/how a man has said; 3) what/how a man behaved. Each of these categories would have supporters in the City as to which was most important, but in general, men are not wired-up to be concerned, as far as changing, with what they think or say, only with what they actually do; they judge their change by their action, not thought or speech.
The changing of the first two are discussed ad nauseam but are not truly attempted. Why is this so? In these areas of man’s purview, where would ‘feeling’ belong? Note that J. could have included it as a fourth judgment basis and it would have seemed equally valid to the more restricted options given. This is the weakness of old intelligence, the injection point of the mold of man’s consciousness.
In a conversation between two people regarding a third, absent, who is nevertheless represented by a letter he has sent to one of the two. One defends the letter writer thusly: “He is really nothing like this letter he wrote, which upsets you.” This is really saying: “he is not his behavior, in this particular instance”. But how is this possible? How can you separate a person from his behavior? This constantly escapes old intelligence.
NOUNS vis-a-vis VERBS
GOODS vis-a-vis SERVICES
Consciousness is designed to take everything as nouns because it takes less effort to do so; it is a built-in laziness (conservation of energy). Nothing is required of man until verbs/services are involved. It is up to man to animate, make more complex, what is inanimate; man is required to turn nouns into verbs, goods into services. It is his lot to move what is in its native environment to another location; to optimize its value in energy exchange. Yet old intelligence still takes the service as animated, man-complexed goods, to be a noun! (or only a temporary verb). Thus no sentence is ever complete, conclusive; it has only nouns. Even “life” and “death” are seen as nouns, not services/verbs.
1:21 Questions addressed from Group.
1.)Bankers, moneylenders have an odor about them resulting from their dealing with debt, and trafficking in the non-existent (money), this is the basis of the traditional prejudice against their profession.
2.) Is it correct for a Real Revolutionist to have a child? The Real Revolutionist does not have to obey biological mandates from Life, they are irrelevant; the proper question for a Real Revolutionist in this regard is “what Revolutionary profit is in this for me?”
3.) Talent seems to be effortless and natural, uncultivated; should it be the same for us in doing This Thing?
4.) When Life is about to change something there is a strange dilution or breakdown of the usually well defined separation between TOA ( Thinking of Action) and Action.
And Kyroot Said…
What everyone else imagines, a real revolutionist knows, and
what everyone else knows, a revolutionist forgets.
***
The only condemnation worth a damn is self condemnation,
(and even that is only worth half a damn).
***
The routine info/energy exchanges between men are always
reflections of prevailing official city reality, and do not begin
to convey, or touch, the level of revolutionary data.
***
If you don’t think that sequence is damn near everything,
just try and change your place in line.
***
While sitting in a city park, a revolutionist overheard a
conversation in which one person told another in a most serious
tone, “I just PRAY that I’m wrong,” and he laughed so hard he
frightened an old oak tree into wetting itself.
***
Everyone has a “secret vice” they believe they desire, but
which they never consummate in a manner that produces the
imagined pleasure.
***
As gods and philosophies get older, they can’t be as
choosey.
***
History, to use the parlance of TV programming, certainly
proves the value of “lead-ins.”
***
One ole city atheist said that the only down side to his
situation was that his only source of advice was his lawyer.
***
One guy sitting next to me on a park bench in the city
confided that he found the whole concept of death “droll.”
***
People who can BE subdued probably need to be so-ed,
periodically.
***
Why be a “ph” in an “f” world.
***
“I’ll tell you what it is,” he cried, “you want me to tell
you what it is? OK, I’ll tell you. The human race is either
organized crime, or codified suffering.”
***
There’s this wiry guy who lives in Oslo who runs about the
neighborhood all the time shouting, “So what’s it with you?”
Some of his neighbors wish he would move.
***
So why do you think they CALL it “small talk.”
***
Numbers ain’t shit…neither are most letters.
***
A real revolutionist might play it safe even when he knows
it’s a waste of time.
***
One west coast revolutionist told his partnership, “Don’t
call me, I’LL call me.”
***
The home field advantage don’t mean nothing if you’re
playing the game in the tar pit of your own mind.
***
A real revolutionist sorta smiles at the original asking
price.
***