All Dichotomies Not Opposites, Just Each Other in Reverse
AKS/News Items = None
AKS/News Gallery = None
Summary = See below
Excursion / Task = See Below
Diagrams =
Transcript = None
Summary
#650 ** May 21, 1990 ** – 1:03
Notes by TK
Kyroot to :06. Criticism and defense are related, reflected energy eddies. Defense is criticism in reverse. Secondary Level talk (defining self) or being talked about = defense, a returning of the attack. The Real Revolutionist thus avoids it, understanding the way of energy flow in life. All dichotomies are not opposites, just each other in reverse. Life is the animator of both; your response is part of the original attack.
Example of calling out “there’s a dog in the house!” to your dog, which galvanizes him into action of seek and attack: compared to “there’s an ‘I’ in the house!” (e.g., “I’m not going to put up with that crap!”) eliciting a search and attack (i.e., change) on the part of consciousness. Compare the end of the sentence (“I” action) with the non-existent “I” instigator (Life). Nobody wants to see/hear “I” when it turns out to be the enemy, the critic.
Anybody who needs to defend their intelligence needn’t bother; there’s nothing to defend and nothing attacking. All criticism is well founded, i.e., necessary energy flow for Life or else it would never even register. The enemy’s imagination (fear) is the warriors best weapon.” What if you could threaten the internal enemy in such fashion?
If words were sentient entities of their own, what might they look like?
Excursion
For NP : if words were separate, living entities on their own, what would they look like?